2016-10-17 61 views
0

我有n个变量,每个变量有100行。为了从1重新取样到nrows,下面的代码给出了预期的结果,但是它是单调乏味和不切实际的。要重现的情况下,让该y具有5行suposse:R:重新采样1到带有循环的nrow(y)

y<-rnorm(n=5, mean=10, sd=2) 
R=1000 #number of resamplings 
boot.means = numeric(R) 
for (i in 1:R) { boot.sample = sample(y, 1, replace=T) 
boot.means[i] = mean(boot.sample) } 
m1<-mean(boot.means) 
d1<-sd(boot.means) 
cv1 =(d1*100)/m1 

R=1000 #number of resamplings 
boot.means = numeric(R) 
for (i in 1:R) { boot.sample = sample(y, 2, replace=T) 
boot.means[i] = mean(boot.sample) } 
m2<-mean(boot.means) 
d2<-sd(boot.means) 
cv2 =(d2*100)/m2 

R=1000 #number of resamplings 
boot.means = numeric(R) 
for (i in 1:R) { boot.sample = sample(y, 3, replace=T) 
boot.means[i] = mean(boot.sample) } 
m3<-mean(boot.means) 
d3<-sd(boot.means) 
cv3 =(d3*100)/m3 


R=1000 #number of resamplings 
boot.means = numeric(R) 
for (i in 1:R) { boot.sample = sample(y, 4, replace=T) 
boot.means[i] = mean(boot.sample) } 
m4<-mean(boot.means) 
d4<-sd(boot.means) 
cv4 =(d4*100)/m4 


R=1000 #number of resamplings 
boot.means = numeric(R) 
for (i in 1:R) { boot.sample = sample(y, 5, replace=T) 
boot.means[i] = mean(boot.sample) } 
m5<-mean(boot.means) 
d5<-sd(boot.means) 
cv5 =(d5*100)/m5 

CV.OK<-(c(cv1,cv2,cv3,cv4,cv5)) 
plot(CV.OK) 

我想用类似下面的代码,但它给出了意想不到的效果。请,有人可以帮助我。谢谢。

R = 1000 #number of resamplings 
boot.sample=seq(1,5, by=1) 
boot.means = numeric(R) 
boot.sd = numeric(R) 
m = 5 
d = 5 
for (i in 1:5) { 
    for (j in 1:R) { 
    boot.sample[i] = sample(y, i, replace=T) 
    boot.means[j] = mean(boot.sample[i]) 
    boot.sd[j] = sd(boot.sample[i]) 
    m[i]=mean(boot.means[j]) 
    d[i]=mean(boot.sd[j]) 
    } 
} 
CV.Fail<-(d*100)/m 

回答

0

我想你想要这样的:

y<-rnorm(n=5, mean=10, sd=2) 
R = 1000 #number of resamplings 
CVs <- numeric(5) 
for (i in 1:5) { 
    boot.means = numeric(R) 
    for (j in 1:R) { 
    boot.sample = sample(y, i, replace=T) 
    boot.means[j] = mean(boot.sample) 
    } 
    m=mean(boot.means) 
    d=sd(boot.means) 
    CVs[i] = (d*100)/m 
} 
plot(CVs) 
0

在R,你应该尽量避免环路,因为它们是相当缓慢的。 我希望我能够正确地理解这个问题,并且写一点功能,让你从不同的角度开始。

library(plyr) 
library(dplyr) 

# dummy data set 
data_set = data.frame(value = runif(200), group = rep(c("a", "b"), each=100)) 

# create a function that takes the sample size as an argument 
iterative_sample = function(sample_size, data){ 
# group the data (your 'n' equals the number of groups- 
# here thats 'a' and 'b' 
    sample_temp = dplyr::group_by(data, group) %>% 
    # take x (sample size) samples from each group 
    sample_n(sample_size, replace=T) %>% 
    # compute summary stats for each group 
    summarize(mean = mean(value), sd = sd(value)) %>% 
    # attach the sample size to keep track 
    mutate(sample_size = sample_size) 
    # we must return a dataframe to uses ldply later on 
    return(sample_temp) 
} 

# thats the vector we are going to iterate over using ldply 
sample_vect = c(1:2) 

# ldplyr (plyr package) takes a list or vector and returns a dataframe and our custom 
# function -checkout the manpage 
# ?ldply 

# ... 
# 
# 
# .data: list to be processed 
# 
#  .fun: function to apply to each piece 
# 
#  ...: other arguments passed on to ‘.fun’ 
# 
# ... 
# 

ldply(.data = sample_vect, .fun = iterative_sample, data_set) 
+0

是的,它按我的预期工作。但是,仍然存在的一个问题是必须指定引导次数,即1000. –

+0

这应该通过'sample_vect'变量指定。因此,如果您选择'sample_vect = c(1:100)',它最终将需要多达100个样本并计算汇总统计。 – sluedtke