0
事实上,我想用亲和传播算法的结果来生成进化算法的初始种群,以解决社交网络中社区检测的问题。所以在算法的每次迭代中我都保留了结果,最后我有N个解,其中N是迭代次数。亲和传播的收敛
蟒蛇代码如下:
def affinity_propagation3(S, preference=None, convergence_iter=25, max_iter=200,
damping=0.5, copy=True, verbose=False,
return_n_iter=False):
S = as_float_array(S, copy=copy)
n_samples = S.shape[0]
L1=[]
if S.shape[0] != S.shape[1]:
raise ValueError("S must be a square array (shape=%s)" % repr(S.shape))
if preference is None:
preference = np.median(S)
if damping < 0.5 or damping >= 1:
raise ValueError('damping must be >= 0.5 and < 1')
random_state = np.random.RandomState(0)
# Place preference on the diagonal of S
S.flat[::(n_samples + 1)] = preference
A = np.zeros((n_samples, n_samples))
R = np.zeros((n_samples, n_samples)) # Initialize messages
# Intermediate results
tmp = np.zeros((n_samples, n_samples))
# Remove degeneracies
S += ((np.finfo(np.double).eps * S + np.finfo(np.double).tiny * 100) *
random_state.randn(n_samples, n_samples))
# Execute parallel affinity propagation updates
e = np.zeros((n_samples, convergence_iter))
ind = np.arange(n_samples)
for it in range(max_iter):
# tmp = A + S; compute responsibilities
np.add(A, S, tmp)
I = np.argmax(tmp, axis=1)
Y = tmp[ind, I] # np.max(A + S, axis=1)
tmp[ind, I] = -np.inf
Y2 = np.max(tmp, axis=1)
# tmp = Rnew
np.subtract(S, Y[:, None], tmp)
tmp[ind, I] = S[ind, I] - Y2
# Damping
tmp *= 1 - damping
R *= damping
R += tmp
# tmp = Rp; compute availabilities
np.maximum(R, 0, tmp)
tmp.flat[::n_samples + 1] = R.flat[::n_samples + 1]
# tmp = -Anew
tmp -= np.sum(tmp, axis=0)
dA = np.diag(tmp).copy()
tmp.clip(0, np.inf, tmp)
tmp.flat[::n_samples + 1] = dA
# Damping
tmp *= 1 - damping
A *= damping
A -= tmp
# Check for convergence
E = (np.diag(A) + np.diag(R)) > 0
e[:, it % convergence_iter] = E
K = np.sum(E, axis=0)
if it >= convergence_iter:
se = np.sum(e, axis=1)
unconverged = (np.sum((se == convergence_iter) + (se == 0))
!= n_samples)
if (not unconverged and (K > 0)) or (it == max_iter):
if verbose:
print("Converged after %d iterations." % it)
break
print "iteration",it
I = np.where(np.diag(A + R) > 0)[0]
K = I.size # Identify exemplars
if K > 0:
c = np.argmax(S[:, I], axis=1)
c[I] = np.arange(K) # Identify clusters
for k in range(K):
ii = np.where(c == k)[0]
j = np.argmax(np.sum(S[ii[:, np.newaxis], ii], axis=0))
I[k] = ii[j]
c = np.argmax(S[:, I], axis=1)
c[I] = np.arange(K)
labels = I[c]
cluster_centers_indices = np.unique(labels)
labels = np.searchsorted(cluster_centers_indices, labels)
L1.append(labels)
if return_n_iter:
return cluster_centers_indices, labels, it + 1
else:
return L1
但我的问题是:几个迭代后的代码返回它们会降低种群的多样性同样的结果。 代码应用“海豚网” https://networkdata.ics.uci.edu/data.php?id=6
预先感谢您
感谢您的回复,但您能否给我建议另一种方法 –
不知道。尝试随机抽样。 –