为什么valgrind没有在我的“测试”程序中检测到内存泄漏？

整个测试代码包含在main.cpp中，如下所示：为什么valgrind没有在我的“测试”程序中检测到内存泄漏？

#include <iostream> 

using std::cout; 
using std::endl; 

void f(int i) { 
    int* pi = new int; 

    *pi = i; 

    std::cout << "*pi = " << *pi << std::endl; 
} 

int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { 
    int i = 0; 

    while (i < 10000) { 
     f(i); 
     ++i; 
    } 

    return 0; 
}

予编译没有优化-O0（从一个Eclipse Qt工程）其中：

g++ -c -pipe -O0 -Wall -W -D_REENTRANT -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_SHARED -I/usr/share/qt4/mkspecs/linux-g++ -I. -I/usr/include/qt4/QtCore -I/usr/include/qt4/QtGui -I/usr/include/qt4 -Irelease -o release/main.o main.cpp

然后作为链接如下：

g++ -Wl,-O0 -o test release/main.o -L/usr/lib -lQtGui -lQtCore -lpthread

我的valgrind通过运行可执行文件，并得到下面的输出：

laptop:~/workspace/test$ valgrind --leak-check=yes test 
==3939== Memcheck, a memory error detector 
==3939== Copyright (C) 2002-2009, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. 
==3939== Using Valgrind-3.6.0.SVN-Debian and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info 
==3939== Command: test 
==3939== 
==3939== 
==3939== HEAP SUMMARY: 
==3939==  in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks 
==3939== total heap usage: 1,387 allocs, 1,387 frees, 64,394 bytes allocated 
==3939== 
==3939== All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible 
==3939== 
==3939== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v 
==3939== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 13 from 8)

我相信Valgrind把报告内存泄漏，而不是没有任何泄漏，因为在呼叫分配给new int

编辑的堆内存是可能的：改变上面的代码使用std ::法院，而不是qDebug （）具有相同的结果

如果我编译和链接相同的代码（从一个Eclipse CDT项目），没有Qt的依赖，Valgrind的检测泄漏：

g++ -O0 -g3 -Wall -c -fmessage-length=0 -MMD -MP -MF"main.d" -MT"main.d" -o"main.o" "../main.cpp" 

g++ -o"test2" ./main.o 

==4604== HEAP SUMMARY: 
==4604==  in use at exit: 40,000 bytes in 10,000 blocks 
==4604== total heap usage: 10,000 allocs, 0 frees, 40,000 bytes allocated 
==4604== 
==4604== 40,000 bytes in 10,000 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 1 
==4604== at 0x402569A: operator new(unsigned int) (vg_replace_malloc.c:255) 
==4604== by 0x8048756: f(int) (main.cpp:7) 
==4604== by 0x80487BB: main (main.cpp:18) 
==4604== 
==4604== LEAK SUMMARY: 
==4604== definitely lost: 40,000 bytes in 10,000 blocks 
==4604== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks 
==4604==  possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks 
==4604== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks 
==4604==   suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks 
==4604== 
==4604== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v 
==4604== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 19 from 8)

我ü唱Kubuntu 10.04 32位，并尝试调试和发布构建，我做错了什么或为什么valgrind报告与Qt链接时的内存泄漏？

来源

2011-01-24 Peter McG

但愿这是编译器消除了代码，因为它认为没有效果呢？ – sharptooth 2011-01-24 08:43:22

@sharptooth：我不这么认为，因为在调试模式下qDebug写入标准输出这是一个副作用，应该防止编译器消除？我也尝试过`std :: cout`而不是`qDebug`（这个调用在release中被删除）并得到相同的结果。你和我有同样的结果吗？ – 2011-01-24 08:51:40

我还没有试过这段代码。但对我来说，看起来应该报告泄漏，并且我可以假设它没有报告的两个原因 - 编译器优化或堆干扰valgrind的特殊实现。 – sharptooth 2011-01-24 08:54:21

发生这种情况的原因是，调用：

valgrind --leak-check=yes test

实际上是在/ usr/bin/test上运行valgrind，它是一个内置程序，用于检查文件类型并比较值，所有我需要的是：

valgrind --leak-check=yes ./test

来源

2011-01-24 09:49:21

我已经取代qDebug（）中std ::法院：

==2426== HEAP SUMMARY: 
==2426==  in use at exit: 40,000 bytes in 10,000 blocks 
==2426== total heap usage: 10,000 allocs, 0 frees, 40,000 bytes allocated 
==2426== 
==2426== LEAK SUMMARY: 
==2426== definitely lost: 39,996 bytes in 9,999 blocks

来源

2011-01-24 08:50:08 knivil

当我使用你的代码和编译器选项时，没有什么改变。也许这是Eclipse的错。 – knivil 2011-01-24 09:25:28

可能是你的编译器消除优化的代码，尝试用-O0编译（没有优化选项）。

至于评论，与Debian的-O2 lenny中，检测到泄漏：

==20547== LEAK SUMMARY: 
==20547== definitely lost: 40,000 bytes in 10,000 blocks. 
==20547==  possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. 
==20547== still reachable: 516 bytes in 7 blocks. 
==20547==   suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. 
==20547== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory.

编译器：

gcc version 4.3.2 (Debian 4.3.2-1.1)

来源

2011-01-24 08:57:16

为什么valgrind没有在我的“测试”程序中检测到内存泄漏？

回答

相关问题