2016-06-28 406 views
13

问题是由于列车数据的大小,我的列车数据不能放入RAM中。所以我需要一种方法,首先在整个列车数据集上构建一棵树,计算残差构建另一棵树等(如梯度增强树)。很显然,如果我在某个循环中调用model = xgb.train(param, batch_dtrain, 2) - 它无济于事,因为在这种情况下,它只是为每批次重建整个模型。如何实施xgboost的增量培训?

+0

例子:https://github.com/dmlc/xgboost/blob/master/tests/python/test_training_continuation.py –

回答

16

声明:我也是xgboost的新手,但我想我已经明白了这一点。

在第一批次训练后尝试保存模型。然后,在连续运行中,为保存模型的文件路径提供xgb.train方法。

这里有一个小实验,我跑到说服自己,它的工作原理:

首先,拆分波士顿数据集为训练和测试集。 然后将训练集分成两半。 适合上半年的模型,并获得一个将作为基准的分数。 然后在下半场适合两个模型;一个型号将具有附加参数xgb_model。如果传递额外的参数没有什么区别,那么我们会期望他们的分数是相似的。 但是,幸运的是,这个新模型似乎表现得比第一个好得多。

import xgboost as xgb 
from sklearn.cross_validation import train_test_split as ttsplit 
from sklearn.datasets import load_boston 
from sklearn.metrics import mean_squared_error as mse 

X = load_boston()['data'] 
y = load_boston()['target'] 

# split data into training and testing sets 
# then split training set in half 
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = ttsplit(X, y, test_size=0.1, random_state=0) 
X_train_1, X_train_2, y_train_1, y_train_2 = ttsplit(X_train, 
                y_train, 
                test_size=0.5, 
                random_state=0) 

xg_train_1 = xgb.DMatrix(X_train_1, label=y_train_1) 
xg_train_2 = xgb.DMatrix(X_train_2, label=y_train_2) 
xg_test = xgb.DMatrix(X_test, label=y_test) 

params = {'objective': 'reg:linear', 'verbose': False} 
model_1 = xgb.train(params, xg_train_1, 30) 
model_1.save_model('model_1.model') 

# ================= train two versions of the model =====================# 
model_2_v1 = xgb.train(params, xg_train_2, 30) 
model_2_v2 = xgb.train(params, xg_train_2, 30, xgb_model='model_1.model') 

print(mse(model_1.predict(xg_test), y_test))  # benchmark 
print(mse(model_2_v1.predict(xg_test), y_test)) # "before" 
print(mse(model_2_v2.predict(xg_test), y_test)) # "after" 

# 23.0475232194 
# 39.6776876084 
# 27.2053239482 

让我知道如果有什么不清楚!

参考:https://github.com/dmlc/xgboost/blob/master/python-package/xgboost/training.py

+1

我会明白model_2_v2的表现比同时使用两个数据集的模型差。但是model_2_v2比model_1更糟糕,因为我们给了model_1看不到的新数据集,但最终model_2_v2表现得更糟......似乎增强树并不是执行增量学习的最佳方法。 @pikachau你尝试使用model_1而不是'experiment.model'吗? –

+0

这可能是因为数据集非常小(样本大小= 150)。对于较大的数据集,我认为model_2_v2应该优于model_1。哦,实验。模型== model_1;我应该让这个更明确! – Alain

4

现在有(0.6版本?)一个process_update参数可能的帮助。这里有一个实验吧:

import pandas as pd 
import xgboost as xgb 
from sklearn.model_selection import ShuffleSplit 
from sklearn.datasets import load_boston 
from sklearn.metrics import mean_squared_error as mse 

boston = load_boston() 
features = boston.feature_names 
X = boston.data 
y = boston.target 

X=pd.DataFrame(X,columns=features) 
y = pd.Series(y,index=X.index) 

# split data into training and testing sets 
rs = ShuffleSplit(test_size=0.3, n_splits=1, random_state=0) 
for train_idx,test_idx in rs.split(X): # this looks silly 
    pass 

train_split = round(len(train_idx)/2) 
train1_idx = train_idx[:train_split] 
train2_idx = train_idx[train_split:] 
X_train = X.loc[train_idx] 
X_train_1 = X.loc[train1_idx] 
X_train_2 = X.loc[train2_idx] 
X_test = X.loc[test_idx] 
y_train = y.loc[train_idx] 
y_train_1 = y.loc[train1_idx] 
y_train_2 = y.loc[train2_idx] 
y_test = y.loc[test_idx] 

xg_train_0 = xgb.DMatrix(X_train, label=y_train) 
xg_train_1 = xgb.DMatrix(X_train_1, label=y_train_1) 
xg_train_2 = xgb.DMatrix(X_train_2, label=y_train_2) 
xg_test = xgb.DMatrix(X_test, label=y_test) 

params = {'objective': 'reg:linear', 'verbose': False} 
model_0 = xgb.train(params, xg_train_0, 30) 
model_1 = xgb.train(params, xg_train_1, 30) 
model_1.save_model('model_1.model') 
model_2_v1 = xgb.train(params, xg_train_2, 30) 
model_2_v2 = xgb.train(params, xg_train_2, 30, xgb_model=model_1) 

params.update({'process_type': 'update', 
       'updater'  : 'refresh', 
       'refresh_leaf': True}) 
model_2_v2_update = xgb.train(params, xg_train_2, 30, xgb_model=model_1) 

print('full train\t',mse(model_0.predict(xg_test), y_test)) # benchmark 
print('model 1 \t',mse(model_1.predict(xg_test), y_test)) 
print('model 2 \t',mse(model_2_v1.predict(xg_test), y_test)) # "before" 
print('model 1+2\t',mse(model_2_v2.predict(xg_test), y_test)) # "after" 
print('model 1+update2\t',mse(model_2_v2_update.predict(xg_test), y_test)) # "after" 

输出:

full train 17.8364309709 
model 1  24.8 
model 2  25.6967017352 
model 1+2 22.8846455135 
model 1+update2 14.2816257268 
+0

哪一个是最终模型还是我应该使用的? – tumbleweed

+2

您想要具有最低MSE的模型。但请注意1 + update2是如何低于整列火车的!我不清楚为什么会出现这种情况,所以我会怀疑这个结果,并运行更多折叠的简历。 – paulperry

2

我创建a gist of jupyter notebook证明xgboost模型可以逐步训练。我用波士顿数据集来训练模型。我做了3个实验 - 一次学习,迭代一次学习,迭代增量学习。在渐进式训练中,我将波士顿数据以批量大小50的形式传递给模型。

要点的要点是您必须多次迭代数据才能使模型收敛到达到一枪(全部数据)学习。

下面是用xgboost进行迭代增量学习的相应代码。

batch_size = 50 
iterations = 25 
model = None 
for i in range(iterations): 
    for start in range(0, len(x_tr), batch_size): 
     model = xgb.train({ 
      'learning_rate': 0.007, 
      'update':'refresh', 
      'process_type': 'update', 
      'refresh_leaf': True, 
      #'reg_lambda': 3, # L2 
      'reg_alpha': 3, # L1 
      'silent': False, 
     }, dtrain=xgb.DMatrix(x_tr[start:start+batch_size], y_tr[start:start+batch_size]), xgb_model=model) 

     y_pr = model.predict(xgb.DMatrix(x_te)) 
     #print(' MSE [email protected]{}: {}'.format(int(start/batch_size), sklearn.metrics.mean_squared_error(y_te, y_pr))) 
    print('MSE [email protected]{}: {}'.format(i, sklearn.metrics.mean_squared_error(y_te, y_pr))) 

y_pr = model.predict(xgb.DMatrix(x_te)) 
print('MSE at the end: {}'.format(sklearn.metrics.mean_squared_error(y_te, y_pr))) 

XGBoost版本:从`xgboost`回购0.6