您可以创建一个将两个或多个对象的动态对象:
class CombineDynamic : DynamicObject
{
private readonly object[] m_objects;
public CombineDynamic(params object[] objects)
{
m_objects = objects;
}
public override bool TryGetMember(GetMemberBinder binder, out object result)
{
var callSite = CallSite<Func<CallSite, object, object>>.Create(binder);
foreach (var o in m_objects)
{
try
{
result = callSite.Target(callSite, o);
return true;
}
catch (RuntimeBinderException)
{}
}
return base.TryGetMember(binder, out result);
}
public override bool TrySetMember(SetMemberBinder binder, object value)
{
// the binder from argument uses compile time type from call site,
// which is object here; because of that, setting of properties that
// aren't of type object wouldn't work if we used that binder directly
var fixedBinder = Binder.SetMember(
CSharpBinderFlags.None, binder.Name, typeof(CombineDynamic),
new[]
{
CSharpArgumentInfo.Create(CSharpArgumentInfoFlags.None, null),
CSharpArgumentInfo.Create(CSharpArgumentInfoFlags.None, null)
});
var callSite =
CallSite<Action<CallSite, object, object>>.Create(fixedBinder);
foreach (var o in m_objects)
{
try
{
callSite.Target(callSite, o, value);
return true;
}
catch (RuntimeBinderException)
{}
}
return base.TrySetMember(binder, value);
}
}
而且使用这样的:
dynamic viewModel = new CombineDynamic(product, new ExpandoObject());
viewModel.AdditionalProperty = "additional data";
当你或动态设置属性,它首先试图做在第一个对象上,然后在第二个对象上,直到它成功。
否则像这样已经(至少)一个怪异的行为:如果,例如,Product
有int
物业类型Id
,代码viewModel.Id = "42";
会成功。但它会在ExpandoObject
上设置属性。因此,如果您之后尝试检索viewModel.Id
,则会从product.Id
返回未修改的int
。
我很可能不会仅仅根据性能做出这样的决定,但您确定'动态'比使用Automapper快吗? – svick
这个问题并不是关于性能,而是更轻量,更灵活。一次创建的视图模型不会超过一百个。 –