我打这个限制也是如此。基本思想是覆盖respondsToSelector
:(不能被OCMock可靠地嘲笑)。
我做了以下这样的课,为你做到这一点。 然后,您可以使用它,如下所示:
延长GCOCMockOptionalMethodSupportingObject
,并实现你的协议
@interface GCTestDelegate : GCOCMockOptionalMethodSupportingObject <GCDelegate>
@end
@implementation GCTestDelegate
//required methods
- (void)requiredMethod{
}
@end
// create your testdelegate
self.classBeingTested.delegate = [OCMock partialMockForObject:[GCTestDelegate new]];
[self.classBeingTested.delegate markSelectorAsImplemented:@selector(optionalMethod:)];
[[self.classBeingTested.delegate expect] optionalMethod:self.classBeingTested];
[self.classBeingTested doSomethingThatwillCheckIfYourDelegateRespondsToYourOptionalMethod];
如果你不叫markSelectorAsImplemented
,那么你的classBeingTested
将获得NO的respondsToSleectorForThatMethod
我已经把这里的代码。我使用这个效果很好。感谢#iphonedev上的jer让我在这条路上脱颖而出(重写respondsToSelector
是他的想法,我正在做一些疯狂的运行时方法增加 - 这是更清洁的methinks)。
这里的代码
/**
* This class is specifically useful and intended for testing code paths that branch
* pending implementation of optional methods.
* OCMock does not support mocking of protocols with unimplemented optional methods.
* Further compounding the issue is the fact that OCMock does not allow mocking of
* respondsToSelector (in fact, it does but the behaviour is undefined),
* As such this class can be extending to implement a given protocol, the methods can be mocked/expected
* as normal, but in addition we can tell the class to report it conforms to a protocol method or not.
*
*/
@interface GCOCMockOptionalMethodSupportingObject : NSObject
- (void)markSelectorAsImplemented:(SEL)aSelector;
- (void)unmarkSelectorAsImplemented:(SEL)aSelector;
@end
#import "GCOCMockOptionalMethodSupportingObject.h"
@interface GCOCMockOptionalMethodSupportingObject()
@property(nonatomic, strong) NSMutableArray *implementedSelectors;
@end
@implementation GCOCMockOptionalMethodSupportingObject {
}
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
#pragma mark init
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
- (id)init {
self = [super init];
if (self) {
self.implementedSelectors = [NSMutableArray array];
}
return self;
}
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
#pragma mark public api
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
- (void)markSelectorAsImplemented:(SEL)aSelector {
if (![self isImplemented:aSelector]) {
[self.implementedSelectors addObject:NSStringFromSelector(aSelector)];
}
}
- (void)unmarkSelectorAsImplemented:(SEL)aSelector {
for (NSString *selectorValue in [self.implementedSelectors mutableCopy]) {
SEL storedSelector = NSSelectorFromString(selectorValue);
if (sel_isEqual(aSelector, storedSelector)) {
[self.implementedSelectors removeObject:selectorValue];
break;
}
}
}
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
#pragma mark private impl
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
- (BOOL)isImplemented:(SEL)aSelector {
for (NSString *selectorValue in self.implementedSelectors) {
SEL storedSelector = NSSelectorFromString(selectorValue);
if (sel_isEqual(aSelector, storedSelector)) {
return YES;
}
}
return NO;
}
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
#pragma mark overridden
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
- (BOOL)respondsToSelector:(SEL)aSelector {
if ([self isImplemented:aSelector]) {
return YES;
} else {
return [super respondsToSelector:aSelector];
}
}
@end
让我问一个问题作为回报。当被问及是否响应可选方法时,为什么模拟应该返回NO。毕竟,这个方法是协议的一部分。 是否可以模拟实现该协议的类?如果这个类没有实现可选方法,那么模拟会做你期望的。 – 2012-08-13 10:30:04
原因是我想测试一个类,当它有一个没有实现可选委托方法的委托时,它的行为是正确的。 – extremeboredom 2012-08-13 14:07:58