1
我有一个RavenDB文件你会如何构建这个RavenDB文档的模型?
{
"RpcTechDataCollectionModel": {
"Weekend": "March 16 - 17, 2013",
"ServiceTitle": "Some Title",
"Notes": "",
"WeekendServices": [{
"ServiceTime": "",
"SiteName": "Bowridge",
"SoundOperator": "Rob",
"WorshipLeader": "Daryl",
"Notes": "",
"Songs": [{
"SongName": "Foo",
"MinSpl": "86",
"MaxSpl": "92",
"Note": ""
}, {
"SongName": "Bar",
"MinSpl": "89",
"MaxSpl": "96",
"Note": ""
}]
}, {
"ServiceTime": "",
"SiteName": "Bearspaw",
"SoundOperator": "Peter",
"WorshipLeader": "Tim",
"Notes": "",
"Songs": [{
"SongName": "Das",
"MinSpl": "86",
"MaxSpl": "91",
"Note": ""
}, {
"SongName": "Bar",
"MinSpl": "87",
"MaxSpl": "99",
"Note": ""
}]
}]
}
}
现在我想建立这样的模型下面的结构,但我想知道什么是最好的方法来组织的那样。请注意,没有一个子对象WeekendService
或Song
将父对象外使用的RpcTechCollectionModel
选择一个将
namespace MyProject.Models {
using System.Collections.Generic;
public class RpcTechDataCollectionModel{
RpcTechDataCollectionModel(){
this.WeekendServices = new List<WeekendService>();
}
public string Weekend { get; set; }
public string ServiceTitle { get; set; }
public string Notes { get; set; }
public List<WeekendService> WeekendServices { get; set; }
public class WeekendService{
WeekendService(){
this.SongRecords = new List<SongRecord>();
}
public DateTime ServiceTime { get; set; }
public string SiteName { get; set; }
public string SoundOperator { get; set; }
public string WorshipLeader { get; set; }
public string Notes { get; set; }
public List<Song> Songs { get; set; }
public class Song {
public string SongName { get; set; }
public double MinSpl { get; set; }
public double MaxMax { get; set; }
public string Note { get; set; }
}
}
}
}
我喜欢这个,因为它是非常干净的,而且容易理解。问题是,它在技术上违反了 “One class per file” 规则
方案二
public class RpcTechDataCollectionModel{
RpcTechDataCollectionModel(){
this.WeekendServices = new List<WeekendService>();
}
public string Weekend { get; set; }
public string ServiceTitle { get; set; }
public string Notes { get; set; }
public List<WeekendService> WeekendServices { get; set; }
}
public class WeekendService{
WeekendService(){
this.SongRecords = new List<SongRecord>();
}
public DateTime ServiceTime { get; set; }
public string SiteName { get; set; }
public string SoundOperator { get; set; }
public string WorshipLeader { get; set; }
public string Notes { get; set; }
public List<Song> Songs { get; set; }
}
public class Song {
public string SongName { get; set; }
public double MinSpl { get; set; }
public double MaxMax { get; set; }
public string Note { get; set; }
}
这并不违反这条规则,但似乎有点像的痛苦。
做这种或那种方式的优点/缺点是什么,并且是一种被认为是“正确/首选”的方式,还是在这种情况下更“浮在你的船上”?
这很有道理。如果我们需要将信息与当前的实现分离开来,那么我认为将它们全部解耦都会增加灵活性。 – 2013-03-18 20:37:08