换句话说,这是一个非常愚蠢的想法吗?如何创建特定于区域,控制器和操作的自定义AuthorizeAttribute?
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class | AttributeTargets.Method)]
public class AuthorizeActionAttribute : AuthorizeAttribute
{
public override void OnAuthorization(AuthorizationContext filterContext)
{
// get the area, controller and action
var area = filterContext.RouteData.Values["area"];
var controller = filterContext.RouteData.Values["controller"];
var action = filterContext.RouteData.Values["action"];
string verb = filterContext.HttpContext.Request.HttpMethod;
// these values combined are our roleName
string roleName = String.Format("{0}/{1}/{2}/{3}", area, controller, action, verb);
// set role name to area/controller/action name
this.Roles = roleName;
base.OnAuthorization(filterContext);
}
}
UPDATE 我试图避免以下,在我们有极其精细的角色权限,因为角色是在每个客户端的基础设置和连接到用户群的情景:
public partial class HomeController : Controller
{
[Authorize(Roles = "/supplierarea/homecontroller/indexaction/")]
public virtual ActionResult Index()
{
return View();
}
[Authorize(Roles = "/supplierarea/homecontroller/aboutaction/")]
public virtual ActionResult About()
{
return View();
}
}
任何人都可以启发我一个安全的方式来编写这个AuthorizeRouteAttribute来访问路由信息并将其用作角色名称吗?正如列维所说,RouteData.Values不安全。
是否使用执行httpContext.Request.Path更安全或更好的做法?
public override void OnAuthorization(AuthorizationContext filterContext)
{
if (filterContext == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("filterContext");
}
if (!filterContext.HttpContext.User.Identity.IsAuthenticated)
{
// auth failed, redirect to login page
filterContext.Result = new HttpUnauthorizedResult();
return;
}
var path = filterContext.HttpContext.Request.Path;
var verb = filterContext.HttpContext.Request.HttpMethod;
// these values combined are our roleName
string roleName = String.Format("{0}/{1}", path, verb);
if (!filterContext.HttpContext.User.IsInRole(roleName))
{
// role auth failed, redirect to login page
filterContext.Result = new HttpUnauthorizedResult();
// P.S. I want to tell the logged in user they don't
// have access, not ask them to login. They are already
// logged in!
return;
}
//
base.OnAuthorization(filterContext);
}
这也许说明了问题远一点:
enum Version
{
PathBasedRole,
InsecureButWorks,
SecureButMissingAreaName
}
string GetRoleName(AuthorizationContext filterContext, Version version)
{
//
var path = filterContext.HttpContext.Request.Path;
var verb = filterContext.HttpContext.Request.HttpMethod;
// recommended way to access controller and action names
var controller =
filterContext.ActionDescriptor.ControllerDescriptor.ControllerName;
var action =
filterContext.ActionDescriptor.ActionName;
var area = "oh dear...."; // mmmm, where's thearea name???
//
var insecureArea = filterContext.RouteData.Values["area"];
var insecureController = filterContext.RouteData.Values["controller"];
var insecureAction = filterContext.RouteData.Values["action"];
string pathRoleName =
String.Format("{0}/{1}", path, verb);
string insecureRoleName =
String.Format("{0}/{1}/{2}/{3}",
insecureArea,
insecureController,
insecureAction,
verb);
string secureRoleName =
String.Format("{0}/{1}/{2}/{3}",
area,
controller,
action,
verb);
string roleName = String.Empty;
switch (version)
{
case Version.InsecureButWorks:
roleName = insecureRoleName;
break;
case Version.PathBasedRole:
roleName = pathRoleName;
break;
case Version.SecureButMissingAreaName:
// let's hope they don't choose this, because
// I have no idea what the area name is
roleName = secureRoleName;
break;
default:
roleName = String.Empty;
break;
}
return roleName;
}
请你可以添加到你的答案,以显示你的建议如何在代码中工作?我们正在使用区域,所以它需要反映这一点以及控制器和操作。出于兴趣,你真的可以匹配一个控制器或行动(即建议:/ myarea/mycontroller/myaction'; DROP TABLE members; - /)?毫无疑问,MVC不会与首先与控制器或操作相匹配? – Junto 2011-02-03 21:24:11
解决您的问题的更新回应。 – Levi 2011-02-04 00:22:29