我无法区分差异。我读了这个:actual-use-of-lockinterruptibly-for-a-reentrantlocklockInterruptibly Vs锁
并想测试它。这里有云代码:
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args){
Test test = new Test();
test.inturreptWork();
//Main group
System.out.println("Main Thread group: "+Thread.currentThread().getThreadGroup().getName());
//System group is the parent of main group. it contains system level threads like finalizer,signal dispatcher,attach listener
System.out.println("Main Thread group: "+Thread.currentThread().getThreadGroup().getParent());
}
public void inturreptWork(){
Inturrept inturrept= new Inturrept();
Thread t1 = new Thread(inturrept,"Thread 1");
Thread t2 = new Thread(inturrept,"Thread 2");
Thread t3 = new Thread(inturrept,"Thread 3");
try{
t1.start();
Thread.sleep(1000);
t2.start();
Thread.sleep(1000);
t2.interrupt();
t3.start();
t1.join();
t2.join();
t3.join();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
finally {
System.out.println("Finally");
}
}
这里是Inturrept类
public class Inturrept implements Runnable {
Lock lock = new ReentrantLock();
@Override
public void run() {
try {
System.out.println("Trying to get lock ,Thread name is: " + Thread.currentThread().getName());
lock.lock();// or lock.lockInterruptibly();
System.out.println("Running");
Thread.sleep(7000);// Use something else to mimic sleep as it throws interrupted exception
lock.unlock();// This caused IllegalMonitorStateException
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
System.out.println("I was inturrepted, Thread name is: " + Thread.currentThread().getName());
e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
lock.unlock();
}
}
}
控制台输出:
Trying to get lock ,Thread name is: Thread 1
Running
Trying to get lock ,Thread name is: Thread 2
Trying to get lock ,Thread name is: Thread 3
Running
Exception in thread "Thread 1" I was inturrepted, Thread name is: Thread 2
java.lang.IllegalMonitorStateException
at java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.tryRelease(ReentrantLock.java:151)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.release(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1261)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock.unlock(ReentrantLock.java:457)
at com.test.main.Inturrept.run(Inturrept.java:21)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
java.lang.InterruptedException: sleep interrupted
at java.lang.Thread.sleep(Native Method)
at com.test.main.Inturrept.run(Inturrept.java:15)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
Running
Exception in thread "Thread 3" Finallyjava.lang.IllegalMonitorStateException
at java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.tryRelease(ReentrantLock.java:151)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.release(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1261)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock.unlock(ReentrantLock.java:457)
at com.test.main.Inturrept.run(Inturrept.java:21)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
Main Thread group: main
Main Thread group: java.lang.ThreadGroup[name=system,maxpri=10]
正如答复中提到:“这是一样的定期锁() 。但如果另一个线程中断等待线程lockInterruptibly()将抛出InterruptedException。“ 即使它是lock.lock()或lock.lockinterruptibly()。线程被中断。所以有什么区别?我明白了什么错,请协助。 还有另外一个问题我已经是为什么我看到线程3“在线程异常‘’在控制台中。它跑,因为我可以看到两个‘在日志的跑道’。
谢谢你。
这是'sleep'抛出了'InterruptedException',不是'锁'。当你中断''线程'时,它会设置它的'中断'标志并将其留在那里。当你的线程最终获得锁定时,它处于这种中断状态并尝试“睡眠”。如果任何线程已经中断了当前线程,'sleep'将抛出一个'InterruptedException'。_ –
另外,请将'lock()'调用移出'try'并移除'try'块内的'unlock()'。 –
@SotiriosDelimanolis我在try中使用了lock方法,因为我使用的是lockInterruptibly。是的,我删除了try中的unlock,我的坏处是给出了IllegalMonitorStateException异常。另外使用thread.sleep()来检查lockInterruptibly是否实际抛出了被中断的异常是错误的。因为当我中断线程时,它将中断标志设置为true,使得睡眠唤醒清除标志并发送抛出的中断异常。结果我无法确定如果lockInterruptibly实际上抛出了InterruptedException。 如果其他人来了 – Kid101