2
我在构造函数中使用比较器时遇到困难。当我尝试下面的代码:在构造函数中使用自定义比较器
InsertionSorter is = new InsertionSorter(bookList.toArray(new Comparable[bookList.size()]), new GenreComparator(), SortType.ASC);
我得到这个错误:
no suitable constructor found for InsertionSorter(java.lang.Comparable[],sort.GenreComparator,sort.SortType)
constructor sort.InsertionSorter.InsertionSorter(java.lang.Comparable[],java.util.Comparator<java.lang.Object>,sort.SortType) is not applicable
(actual argument sort.GenreComparator cannot be converted to java.util.Comparator<java.lang.Object> by method invocation conversion)
constructor sort.InsertionSorter.InsertionSorter(java.lang.Comparable[],sort.SortType) is not applicable
(actual and formal argument lists differ in length)
这里是有用的代码片段:
AbstractSorter.java:
abstract class AbstractSorter {
protected Comparable[] values;
protected Comparator<Object> cmp;
protected SortType st;
protected abstract void doSort();
protected AbstractSorter(Comparable[] init, SortType type) {
values = new Comparable[init.length];
System.arraycopy(init, 0, values, 0, init.length);
cmp = null;
st = type;
}
protected AbstractSorter(Comparable[] init, Comparator<Object> comp, SortType type) {
values = new Comparable[init.length];
System.arraycopy(init, 0, values, 0, init.length);
cmp = comp;
st = type;
}
public Comparable[] getValues() {
return values;
}
}
class InsertionSorter extends AbstractSorter {
public InsertionSorter(Comparable[] init, SortType type) {
super(init, type);
}
public InsertionSorter(Comparable[] init, Comparator<Object> comp, SortType type) {
super(init, comp, type);
}
@Override
public void doSort() {
// sorts values
}
}
enum SortType {ASC, DSC};
书。 java:
public class Book implements Cloneable, Comparable<Book> {
private Person author; // implementation details of Person don't matter here
private String title, isbn;
private int year;
private BookGenre genre;
public Book(Person authorInit, String titleInit, String isbnInit,
int yearInit, BookGenre genreInit) {
author = authorInit;
title = titleInit;
isbn = isbnInit;
year = yearInit;
genre = genreInit;
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return author.toString() + " " + title + " " + isbn + " " + year
+ " " + genre;
}
@Override
public Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException {
return super.clone();
}
@Override
public int compareTo(Book other) {
return author.compareTo(other.author);
}
public Person getAuthor() {
return author;
}
public String getTitle() {
return title;
}
public String getIsbn() {
return isbn;
}
public int getYear() {
return year;
}
public BookGenre getGenre() {
return genre;
}
}
class TitleComparator implements Comparator<Book> {
@Override
public int compare(Book a, Book b) {
return a.getTitle().compareToIgnoreCase(b.getTitle());
}
}
class GenreComparator implements Comparator<Book> {
@Override
public int compare(Book a, Book b) {
return a.getGenre().compareTo(b.getGenre());
}
}
enum BookGenre { COMIC, MYSTERY, SCIENCE, TRAVEL };
编辑感谢Rohit解决这个问题,但现在我有一个相关的问题。在该方法中doSort()
,我的代码片断
cmp.compare(values[j-1], values[j])
(别担心,我有地方检查,以确保这不叫,如果cmp == null
这提供了以下错误:
method compare in interface java.util.Comparator<T> cannot be applied to given types;
required: capture#1 of ? extends java.lang.Object,capture#1 of ? extends java.lang.Object
found: java.lang.Comparable,java.lang.Comparable
reason: actual argument java.lang.Comparable cannot be converted to capture#1 of ? extends java.lang.Object by method invocation conversion
请注意,我已经改变了上面AbstractSort.java与Comparable<? extends Object>
好的,这解决了我原来的问题,但现在当我尝试在'doSort()'方法中使用它时,我得到了不同的东西。我将对原始文章进行编辑,使其实际易读 – wlyles
@whyles将doSort()方法设为通用,会更好。 –
好的,谢谢你的帮助!我制作了'doSort()'通用的(这需要在方法中进行一些转换来理清所有类型),现在一切都很好地流动 – wlyles