我做了一个快速搜索,但似乎无法找到这个问题的答案,只是指继承时复制函数原型。 为什么不将属性添加到构造函数原型obj中,而不是使用this关键字。我确信有一个理由不会,但我想更好地理解JavaScript的细微差别。例如在正常的原型继承中,你会“this”。原型继承和原型对象,为什么不用这个程度?
function Dog(name,age,breed){
this.name=name;
this.age=age;
this.breed=breed;
}
Dog.prototype.bark=function(){console.log("bark bark bark");}
let spike=new Dog("Spike",6,"lab");
let rover=new Dog("Rover",8,"poodle");
//^with the constructor function, no instance has the bark function but
//but refers to the same function on the constructor prototype obj, so the
//same function isn't being duplicated. However new keyword changes the
//context of this to refer to the obj so these properties are duplicated
//on every instance.
//I'm curious as to the reason why new doesn't change this to refer to the
//prototype obj for example and then have the instance refers its
//constructor's prototype like with the bark function?
//for example why isn't this a common pattern and what are the reasons I
//should use it.
function Dog(name,age,breed){
Dog.prototype.name=name;
Dog.prototype.age=age;
Dog.prototype.breed=breed;
}
let spike=new Dog("Spike",6,"lab");
let rover=new Dog("rover",8,"poodle");
//I feel like the above code would be more DRY, I'm sure there is a reason
// this isn't common and I'm curious as to why
看看'spike.name'是什么时候你做你的方式,你会明白为什么人们不这样做你的方式。 – user2357112