好吧,我花了很长时间,但我想我已经找到了如何做到这一点。这是会发现所有的“父母”的变更代码:
/// <summary>
/// Gets the changesets which have resulted in the given changeset due
/// to a merge operation.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="changeset">The changeset.</param>
/// <param name="versionControlServer">The version control server.</param>
/// <returns>
/// A list of all changesets that have resulted into the given changeset.
/// </returns>
public static List<Changeset> GetMergedChangesets(Changeset changeset, VersionControlServer versionControlServer)
{
// remember the already covered changeset id's
Dictionary<int, bool> alreadyCoveredChangesets = new Dictionary<int, bool>();
// initialize list of parent changesets
List<Changeset> parentChangesets = new List<Changeset>();
// go through each change inside the changeset
foreach(Change change in changeset.Changes)
{
// query for the items' history
var queryResults = versionControlServer.QueryMergesExtended(
new ItemSpec(change.Item.ServerItem, RecursionType.Full),
new ChangesetVersionSpec(changeset.ChangesetId),
null,
null);
// go through each changeset in the history
foreach (var result in queryResults)
{
// only if the target-change is the given changeset, we have a hit
if (result.TargetChangeset.ChangesetId == changeset.ChangesetId)
{
// if that hit has already been processed elsewhere, then just skip it
if (!alreadyCoveredChangesets.ContainsKey(result.SourceChangeset.ChangesetId))
{
// otherwise add it
alreadyCoveredChangesets.Add(result.SourceChangeset.ChangesetId, true);
parentChangesets.Add(versionControlServer.GetChangeset(result.SourceChangeset.ChangesetId));
}
}
}
}
return parentChangesets;
}
编辑:
我才意识到,有在上面的代码中的小“错误”,我以前写“ VersionSpec.Latest“,但是:”新的ChangesetVersionSpec(changeset.ChangesetId)“会更好,因为一旦源分支已被删除,变更集也将被跟踪。
上面的链接已经死了。 – 2016-08-22 18:25:43