我正在开发一个将点对点通信转换为集体通信的项目。MPI点对点通信到集体通信:MPI_Scatterv问题
本质上,我想要做的是使用MPI_Scatterv而不是MPI_Send和MPI_Recv。我无法确定的是Scatterv的正确论据。
这里是我在我工作的功能:
void read_block_vector (
char *s, /* IN - File name */
void **v, /* OUT - Subvector */
MPI_Datatype dtype, /* IN - Element type */
int *n, /* OUT - Vector length */
MPI_Comm comm) /* IN - Communicator */
{
int datum_size; /* Bytes per element */
int i;
FILE *infileptr; /* Input file pointer */
int local_els; /* Elements on this proc */
MPI_Status status; /* Result of receive */
int id; /* Process rank */
int p; /* Number of processes */
int x; /* Result of read */
datum_size = get_size (dtype);
MPI_Comm_size(comm, &p);
MPI_Comm_rank(comm, &id);
/* Process p-1 opens file, determines number of vector
elements, and broadcasts this value to the other
processes. */
if (id == (p-1)) {
infileptr = fopen (s, "r");
if (infileptr == NULL) *n = 0;
else fread (n, sizeof(int), 1, infileptr);
}
MPI_Bcast (n, 1, MPI_INT, p-1, comm);
if (! *n) {
if (!id) {
printf ("Input file '%s' cannot be opened\n", s);
fflush (stdout);
}
}
/* Block mapping of vector elements to processes */
local_els = BLOCK_SIZE(id,p,*n);
/* Dynamically allocate vector. */
*v = my_malloc (id, local_els * datum_size);
if (id == (p-1)) {
for (i = 0; i < p-1; i++) {
x = fread (*v, datum_size, BLOCK_SIZE(i,p,*n),
infileptr);
MPI_Send (*v, BLOCK_SIZE(i,p,*n), dtype, i, DATA_MSG,
comm);
}
x = fread (*v, datum_size, BLOCK_SIZE(id,p,*n),
infileptr);
fclose (infileptr);
} else {
MPI_Recv (*v, BLOCK_SIZE(id,p,*n), dtype, p-1, DATA_MSG,
comm, &status);
}
// My Attempt at making this collective communication:
if(id == (p-1))
{
x = fread(*v,datum_size,*n,infileptr);
for(i = 0; i < p; i++)
{
size[i] = BLOCK_SIZE(i,p,*n);
}
//x = fread(*v,datum_size,BLOCK_SIZE(id, p, *n),infileptr);
fclose(infileptr);
}
MPI_Scatterv(v,send_count,send_disp, dtype, storage, size[id], dtype, p-1, comm);
}
任何帮助,将不胜感激。
谢谢
我假设你已经在http://www.mcs.anl.gov/research/projects采取一看/mpi/www/www3/MPI_Scatterv.html(谷歌搜索的第一个结果)?你得到什么样的错误? – adamdunson 2013-03-28 01:55:35
我确实看过那个。这非常有帮助。事实证明,我的错误实际上来自动态内存分配问题。我能够解决这些问题。 感谢您的帮助。 – user2188190 2013-03-28 18:53:27