4
我有以下情况（Ubuntu 15.10和Debian测试）gcc5.2 abi变更 - >兼容性保证？
我有Lib A编译没有cxx11和lib B使用-std = C++ 11。 B包括和连接对A，A使用提升。
如果我将B链接到A，则在dynload期间创建的应用程序a会崩溃。 如果我编译A没有cxx11或B与cxx11一切正常。
我的问题：据我了解ABI命名空间添加应保证类型的问题。我错了吗？
我创建了一个示例项目来澄清问题： https://github.com/goldhoorn/sandbox/tree/gcc5.2-issue test1失败，其他测试通过。
GDB告诉我：
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00007ffff7bceb2e in _GLOBAL__sub_I_Lib.cpp() from ./libmyLib.so
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff7bceb2e in _GLOBAL__sub_I_Lib.cpp() from ./libmyLib.so
#1 0x00007ffff7deaa0a in call_init (l=<optimized out>, [email protected]=1,
[email protected]=0x7fffffffe688, [email protected]=0x7fffffffe698)
at dl-init.c:78
#2 0x00007ffff7deaaf3 in call_init (env=0x7fffffffe698, argv=0x7fffffffe688,
argc=1, l=<optimized out>) at dl-init.c:36
#3 _dl_init (main_map=0x7ffff7ffe1a8, argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe688,
env=0x7fffffffe698) at dl-init.c:126
#4 0x00007ffff7ddd1ca in _dl_start_user() from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
#5 0x0000000000000001 in ??()
#6 0x00007fffffffe89f in ??()
#7 0x0000000000000000 in ??()
结果从Valgrind的：
[email protected]:/tmp/example$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. valgrind --show-below-main=yes ./main
==17140== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==17140== Copyright (C) 2002-2015, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==17140== Using Valgrind-3.11.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==17140== Command: ./main
==17140==
==17140==
==17140== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==17140== Bad permissions for mapped region at address 0x401FE8
==17140== at 0x4E3EB2E: _GLOBAL__sub_I_Lib.cpp (in /tmp/example/libmyLib.so)
==17140== by 0x400EA09: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:78)
==17140== by 0x400EAF2: call_init (dl-init.c:36)
==17140== by 0x400EAF2: _dl_init (dl-init.c:126)
==17140== by 0x40011C9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.19.so)
==17140==
==17140== HEAP SUMMARY:
==17140== in use at exit: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks
==17140== total heap usage: 1 allocs, 0 frees, 72,704 bytes allocated
==17140==
==17140== LEAK SUMMARY:
==17140== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==17140== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==17140== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==17140== still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks
==17140== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==17140== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==17140==
==17140== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==17140== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Segmentation fault
你用'g ++ -Wall -Wextra -g'编译了吗？您是否使用[valgrind]（http://valgrind.org/），'gdb'和[地址清理程序]（http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AddressSanitizer）来了解您的错误？ plase在你的问题中显示一些示例代码（[MVCE]（http://stackoverflow.com/help/mcve）...）所以请**编辑你的问题**以改善它 –
其实至少'std ABI级别的:: string'不同于'-std = C++ 11'和'-std = c = + 03'，所以混合使用不同的标准会造成随机崩溃。加上c + + 11没有立即实现，所以一些旧的gcc'std :: string'不是马克C++ 11的要求，所以你看不到任何崩溃。 – fghj
@ user1034749据我了解应该新的ABI导致unlinkebale代码。这是我的问题，为什么这不会发生在这里：http://developerblog.redhat.com/2015/02/05/gcc5-and-the-c11-abi/ –